tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6037263425226837432.post2478255931097882079..comments2022-12-31T20:03:34.406-05:00Comments on 1969 Topps Baseball: Mike Cuellar (#453)Jim from Downingtownhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01537007940455183397noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6037263425226837432.post-1411767099393998582016-12-10T12:20:31.274-05:002016-12-10T12:20:31.274-05:00Cuellar for Blefary. What a steal!Cuellar for Blefary. What a steal!Jim from Downingtownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01537007940455183397noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6037263425226837432.post-1335405804929611242016-04-14T07:54:04.678-04:002016-04-14T07:54:04.678-04:00I never understood Topps' need to put "Ho...I never understood Topps' need to put "Houston" on the fronts of cards instead of "Astros." Copyright issue, I'm guessing? And now for the first time ever, I see that they used Astros on the back, in his write-up. What the hey?<br /><br />This is one beautiful card. There's a handful of '69s taken pretty close to the subject as though with a Polaroid camera that really come out nice. Chris Short and Ron Brand are other examples.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com